FILE 001 · FOUNDING · DRAFT

Exodus 1960

Directed by Otto Preminger. Screenplay by Dalton Trumbo, from Leon Uris's 1958 novel. 212 minutes. Holocaust survivors break out of the British camps on Cyprus and sail for Palestine; the film ends on the eve of the 1948 war.

Chosen for: Oscar for best score; about $20 million worldwide. Selection rules

Future type: Integrative, open only to the Arab who dies a friend

Key scene

Frame to be added after viewing
(the shared grave)

Timecode: to be added · Closing scene

Karen, a young survivor, and Taha, the Arab friend, are laid in one grave. Over it, Ari swears that Jews and Arabs will one day share the land in life as they now share it in death. Then the trucks leave for war. The film can picture a shared future only over a shared grave.

The five questions

How the film answers

Promise

Yes

Does the film show a future in which the conflict is over?

Everything moves towards statehood: the ship that is let through, the state that is coming, the eulogy that promises peace. The war that follows is shown as a passage, not an outcome. The future is certain; only its date is open.

Whose future

Partly

Is there a place in that future for Palestinians?

One Arab has a place: Taha, the village headman and Ari's childhood friend, drawn with warmth. But he earns it by warning the Jews and pays for it with his life. The Arabs who fight are led by the Mufti and trained by a German Nazi; the people of Taha's village drop out of the story. The future has room for a friend, not for a people.

To check while watching: whether the village's residents are seen again after Taha's death, and how the Nazi figure is introduced.

Belief

Yes

Do the characters believe the promise can be kept?

No one doubts the destination. The quarrel between Ari's father, who trusts diplomacy, and his uncle Akiva, who leads the Irgun's bombs, is a quarrel about means. Even the American outsider, Kitty, ends up on the trucks.

Cost

Partly

Is the price of the promise shown, and who pays it?

The film does not hide its own side's violence: the Irgun bombs the King David Hotel, and the family argues about it. But the price that is mourned is Jewish: Akiva, Karen, Dafna before them. The dead of the hotel and the Arabs displaced by the war are not counted.

Past

Yes

Does the film ground its future in the Holocaust?

Three ways. The refugees are survivors, and the camps on Cyprus echo the camps they left. Dov's confession of what was done to him in Auschwitz is the price of entry into the Irgun. And the enemy in Palestine is led by a Nazi, with swastikas painted on the walls where Taha is found. The film carries the moral order of the Holocaust into 1948: whoever opposes the state stands with the Nazis.

To check while watching: the content of Dov's confession. Accounts disagree on whether the film keeps the novel's Sonderkommando past or replaces it.

Film and record

What the film changes

Event
In the film
In the record
The ship
Sails from Cyprus with 611 detainees. A hunger strike in Famagusta forces the British to let it go.
The President Warfield sailed from Sète, France, in July 1947 with more than 4,500 people. The British boarded it, towed it to Haifa and shipped the passengers back to Europe, finally to camps in Germany.4
The hunger strike
Wins the voyage.
Took place in France, aboard the deportation ships at Port-de-Bouc, and did not stop the return to Germany.4
The outcome
A victory.
A defeat at sea that became a victory in public opinion abroad.4 The film keeps the victory and drops the defeat.
The Arab side
Led by the Mufti and a German Nazi.
The Mufti's wartime collaboration with Nazi Germany is documented; the film turns it into the face of all Arab resistance in 1947–48.
1948
Ends as the war begins.
The war displaced an estimated 700,000 Palestinians or more. Stopping at its first day keeps the displacement off screen.

Before the film

The file

Evidence level: Institutional, pending confirmation in primary sources. The AFI Catalog reports Israeli navy ships playing British ones.

A screenplay before a novel

MGM first commissioned an original screenplay from Uris, then dropped it in 1956; Uris turned the material into the novel. Preminger bought the rights and rejected Uris's script, by one account as too anti-British and anti-Arab.21

IndustrySourced

Israeli ships, American Marines

The British Army refused to help. According to the AFI Catalog, Israeli destroyers were sent to Cyprus to stand in for British ships, and US Marines played British soldiers; the US Defense Department barred off-duty servicemen from appearing.2

InstitutionalConfirm in primary sources

Filmed while Eichmann was taken

Shooting ran from March to June 1960.2 Adolf Eichmann was captured in Buenos Aires in May 1960 and brought to Israel for trial: the Holocaust returned to the headlines while the film was being made.

ContextSourced

A blacklisted writer, named on screen

Preminger credited Dalton Trumbo under his own name, one of the first open breaks with the Hollywood blacklist.23

IndustrySourced

How it was sold

Saul Bass's title art: raised arms in a flame, the highest one holding a rifle, used across the publicity. Tickets went on sale the day shooting began. The film cost about $4.5 million and earned about $20 million worldwide; Ernest Gold's score won the Oscar.21

MarketingSourced

A claim not adopted

A widely repeated story says a public-relations man commissioned Uris to write the novel for Israel. Critics of the story note that it rests on the PR man's own later boast and is not supported by Uris's papers or his biographers.7 Until a document settles it, the file does not use it.

Not published as fact

Politics around the film

When it came out, and after

1960

Israel was twelve years old, four years after the Suez war, and the United States had not yet made it a close ally. The film was screened at Cannes in 1961 out of competition.1

Writing in Film Quarterly, Gideon Bachmann called it "the best promotion Israel ever had".1

After

Scholars credit the novel and film with shaping how Americans understood Israel's founding, as a frontier and liberation story told in American terms.5 The promise spoken over the grave, a land shared in life, has not been kept.

Sources

  1. Exodus (1960 film), Wikipedia: plot, cast, awards, box office, reception. Starting point only; to be replaced by primary sources.
  2. Exodus (1960), AFI Catalog of Feature Films: production history.
  3. Exodus, Turner Classic Movies article.
  4. Exodus 1947, United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, Holocaust Encyclopedia.
  5. Amy Kaplan, Our American Israel: The Story of an Entangled Alliance (Harvard University Press, 2018); summarised in JSTOR Daily.
  6. M. M. Silver, Our Exodus: Leon Uris and the Americanization of Israel's Founding Story (Wayne State University Press, 2010). To be read for the production history.
  7. Summary of Martin Kramer's critique of the commissioning story (a partisan source; cited for the dispute, not as a verdict).
  8. Ella Shohat, Israeli Cinema: East/West and the Politics of Representation (1987; 2nd ed. 2010).